So our last meeting was basically an introduction to our project-- I talked about who we were ("AlphaLogic") and what we were going to do, and how we were going to do it--fitting into the timeline, etc. It wasn't just me talking though, we had a good discussion about the overall project timeline and a broad overview of our project's core components. I think by the end of the meeting everyone knew how the weekly meetings were going to work, they knew what was expected of them, both in terms of out-of-uni communication and workloads, and generally what direction this project was going to head in.
This next meeting tomorrow is going to be some more in-depth planning, discussing in concrete terms what we're going to do, and when. I will be making some deadlines for certain aspects of the project so that we keep the ball rolling from week to week. I will be assigning tasks to every member and following up on them in the next meeting.
I personally think that our project is very interesting which makes us a prime candidate for students without a group yet to target us. So I have a feeling that either I'm going to be turning away a few people (I really only want people who are enthusiastic, and if they don't have a group by the fourth week how enthusiastic can they be?) or maybe accepting another member if they meet the criteria. What I don't want to happen is someone to be lazy (or ignorant) and get assigned automatically to our group that doesn't want to do what we're doing (either idea-wise or workload-wise) -- it's going to make it harder for us and it definitely won't be the optimal choice for them.
More later,
Jordan
No comments:
Post a Comment